Civil liability Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Civil obligation - Research Paper ExampleCivil Liability Introduction It is no doubt that technological advancements crosswise the world have greatly improved peoples way of lives. Nonetheless, these advancements have made benevolent beings to be more vulnerable to technological threats that have compromised their gumshoe. In particular, advancements in the area of telecommunications have called for heighten measures in unrestricted safety telecommunications. In recent times, the United States has been facing increasing threats to the cyber security and resiliency of its telecommunications networks. It is against this background that the government and other stakeholders in the telecommunications industry have enhanced their efforts in ensuring public safety telecommunications (APCO Institute, 1997). They seek to enhance public safety by preventing telecommunications-related emergencies and responding swiftly when such emergencies occur. While the benefits of telecommunications are numerous, thither are also liability risks for telecommunications operators and their employees. Telecommunications operators are required to publish reading to follow established guidelines relating to public safety telecommunications. ... City of Hueytown. Facts of the case of Michael Swan v. City of Hueytown On 3rd May, 2000, Michael Swan was a rider in a vehicle that was stopped by Hueytown Police Department officer, Ben Williams. The officer asked to see the madcap licenses of the passenger, Swan, and that of the number one wood. Since Alabama Code, 1975 Section 15-5-30 provides for a sheriff, police, or other officer to stop a car if he suspects is committing, about to commit, or committed a public offense and demand information about the driver or explanations, it is in order that the vehicle in which Swan was boarding to be stopped. Officer Williams whence radioed the Hueytown Police Department appetiser who searched the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) dat abase using the information provided to him by Officer Williams to determine whether Swan had expectant warrants. Officer Williams cannot figure out clearly the kind of information that he provided to the dispatcher, but he testified that he would normally have provided the detainees date of experience and name, or his Social Security number, or drivers license number. Officer Williams was notified by the dispatcher that the City of Birmingham had an outstanding warrant of Swan. Officer Williams sought to confirm and found that indeed Michael Swan had an outstanding warrant (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005). However, later evidence showed that the outstanding warrants were not for Michael Swan but for Michael Swann (the surname recite with two ns not one). Apparently, Officer Williams and the dispatcher failed to react or recognize the discrepancy in spelling the last name. As a result of this discrepancy, Officer Williams arrested Swan and subsequently took him to the